4.5 Article

Health effects of low level exposure to lead among communication radio repair workers at Samutsakhon province, Thailand

期刊

HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 344-351

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2020.1714425

关键词

low-lead exposure; blood lead level (BLL); symptoms of lead exposure; radio-repair worker

资金

  1. Grant for the 90th anniversary of Chulalongkorn university fund
  2. Grant for International Research Integration: Chula Research Scholar, Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund [GCURS 59-06-79-01]
  3. Office of International Affairs Scholarship for Short-Term Research, Chulalongkorn University
  4. New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, Rutgers University
  5. NIH-NIEHS [CEED P30 ES005022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that prolonged low-lead exposure among communication radio-repair workers may have adverse health effects, particularly significant association with hypertension.
Prolonged low-lead exposure of communication radio-repair workers working routinely for soldering may have adverse health. This study aims to investigate health effects of lead exposure among workers working in a plant building. There were 66 repair workers in exposed group and 54 clerks in low exposed group. The structured-questionnaire of general characteristics was used for face to face interview. Blood samples were collected for assessing blood lead level (BLL), hepatic and kidney functions. High blood pressure was also diagnosed. Mean age (SD) of exposed and low exposed group were 36.9 (10.1) and 41.3 (10.7) years old. Of 39.4% exposed group was working 6 h/day and 61.1% of low exposed group was 8 h/day. Median BLL of the exposed group was 2.28 mu g/dL which was higher than BLL of another group at 1.04 mu g/dL (p-value < .001). There was the significant association between BLL and hypertension (OR = 1.384 and p-value = .040). The findings revealed that there were existing adverse effects of low-lead levels on the workers working in the same plant building.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据