4.7 Article

Investigating the gene expression profiles of cells in seven embryonic stages with machine learning algorithms

期刊

GENOMICS
卷 112, 期 3, 页码 2524-2534

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.02.004

关键词

Mouse embryonic cell; Gene expression profile; Feature selection method; Rule learning algorithm

资金

  1. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project [2017SHZDZX01]
  2. National Key RAMP
  3. D Program of China [2018YFC0910403]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31701151]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [17ZR1412500]
  6. Shanghai Sailing Program [16YF1413800]
  7. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [2016245]
  8. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (STCSM) [18dz2271000]
  9. Key Laboratory of Stem Cell Biology of Chinese Academy of Sciences [201703]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of embryonic cells involves several continuous stages, and some genes are related to embryogenesis. To date, few studies have systematically investigated changes in gene expression profiles during mammalian embryogenesis. In this study, a computational analysis using machine learning algorithms was performed on the gene expression profiles of mouse embryonic cells at seven stages. First, the profiles were analyzed through a powerful Monte Carlo feature selection method for the generation of a feature list. Second, increment feature selection was applied on the list by incorporating two classification algorithms: support vector machine (SVM) and repeated incremental pruning to produce error reduction (RIPPER). Through SVM, we extracted several latent gene biomarkers, indicating the stages of embryonic cells, and constructed an optimal SVM classifier that produced a nearly perfect classification of embryonic cells. Furthermore, some interesting rules were accessed by the RIPPER algorithm, suggesting different expression patterns for different stages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据