4.7 Article

A comparative study on soot particle size distributions in premixed flames of RP-3 jet fuel and its surrogates

期刊

FUEL
卷 259, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116222

关键词

RP-3 jet fuel; Particle size distribution; Surrogate; Soot

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51776124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soot particle size distribution functions (PSDFs) of RP-3 jet fuel and its three surrogates, n-decane and two ndecane/1, 2, 4-trimethylbenzene blends were studied on the burner stabilized stagnation flame platform. The PSDFs of all the flames showed transitions from the unimodal (nucleation mode only) to the bimodal (nucleation and accumulation modes) distribution as the separation distance increased. However, the surrogates did not well capture soot behaviors of RP-3 jet fuel. At most heights, the flame of the surrogate blend of higher 1, 2, 4-trimethylbenzene fraction showed the strongest nucleation and accumulation strengths, whereas the flame of RP-3 jet fuel had the lowest nucleation strengths and n-decane had the lowest accumulation strengths, respectively. Besides, the PSDF of the surrogate blend of higher 1, 2, 4-trimethylbenzene fraction showed later shifts from the nucleation mode to the accumulation mode and higher particle growth rates than the other flames. The PSDF of the n-decane flame shifted, at an earlier time, from the nucleation mode to the accumulation mode and showed lower particle growth rates. RP-3 jet fuel showed intermediate mobility diameters of the trough and median mobility diameters at the accumulation mode. The computed acetylene and benzene concentration profiles of the blend of higher 1, 2, 4-trimethylbenzene fraction were higher, suggesting its stronger nucleation strengths and faster particle growth rates, agreeing well with the experimental observation. On the other hand, RP-3 jet fuel produced larger number density of particles firstly and then lower number density than the other fuels with increased heights.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据