4.7 Article

Involvement of PERK-CHOP pathway in fumonisin B1-induced cytotoxicity in human gastric epithelial cells

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.111080

关键词

Fumonisin B1; Apoptosis; ER stress; PERK-CHOP pathway; GES-1 cells; Flow cytometry

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1600304]
  2. MOST [2016YFE0112900, 201513006-02-3]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772087]
  4. Shanghai Agriculture Applied Technology Development Program, China [2019-02-08-00-02-F01145]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fumonisin B1 (FB1) is a mycotoxin, produced by Fusarium verticillioides and Fusarium proliferatum, and a common fungal contaminant of maize worldwide. Its potential health hazard as a natural toxin is well documented in human and domestic animals. However, the molecular mechanism and the key factors responsible for FB1-induced cytotoxicity have not been elucidated. In this study, we first examined the cytotoxicity induced by FB1 in human gastric epithelial cell line (GES-1). We found that FB1 notably decreased cell viability and induced apoptotic cell death. Furthermore, the levels of ER stress markers were significantly increased after FB1 exposure and the ER stress inhibitor 4-phenylbutyric acid strongly suppressed FB1-induced cytotoxicity. Interestingly, the inhibition of PERK activity by GSK2606414 or shPERK3 blocked FB1-induced apoptotic cell death and cell proliferation suppression, which indicated that the cytotoxicity induced by FB1 was dependent on this signalling pathway. Moreover, myriocin could relieve FE1-induced ER stress and prevent cell death, which implied that the disruption of sphingolipid metabolism is an apical event for FB1-induced cytotoxicity. In the present study, we demonstrated that the ER stress-related PERK-CHOP signalling pathway is a novel mechanism for FB1-induced cytotoxicity and the gastrointestinal injury caused by FB1 should be concerned in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据