4.7 Article

Quality investment, and the contract manufacturer's encroachment

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 279, 期 2, 页码 407-418

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.06.004

关键词

Supply chain management; Quality investment; Free rider; Supply chain encroachment

资金

  1. Ryoichi Sasakawa Young Leaders Fellowship Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper studies a supply chain in which the incumbent original equipment manufacturer is the quality leader and the encroaching contract manufacturer is the quality follower acting as a free rider for the former's investment in quality improvement. Investigations were made into the contract manufacturer's encroaching conditions and the original equipment manufacturer's strategies of investment in quality improvement to deter the contract manufacturer's encroachment. Results show that, different from the traditional encroachment, the contract manufacturer always has the incentive to encroach on the original equipment manufacturer's final market if there is no quality investment opportunity. However, if quality investment is attainable for the original equipment manufacturer, there exists a threshold for the contract manufacturer's imitating capability, in excess of which the contract manufacturer will encroach on the original equipment manufacturer's final market. The structure of quality improvement plays a critical role regarding deterring the contract manufacturer's imitation and encroachment, and the encroachment is conditional when the contract manufacturer's imitating ability is relatively weak. Moreover, the threat of the potential entrant will facilitate the original equipment manufacturer's quality investment, even though the quality investment per se is unprofitable. Under certain conditions with quality investment, the contract manufacturer's encroachment can improve the original equipment manufacturer's profit, thus achieving a win-win outcome. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据