4.7 Article

Slice-selective learning for Alzheimer's disease classification using a generative adversarial network: a feasibility study of external validation

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04676-y

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; [F-18] FDG PET; CT; Generative Adversarial Network; External validation; Feasibility study

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2018M3C7A1056898]
  2. Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of theNational Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2018M3A9H6081483]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018M3C7A1056898] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The aim of this feasibility study was to use slice selective learning using a Generative Adversarial Network for external validation. We aimed to build a model less sensitive to PET imaging acquisition environment, since differences in environments negatively influence network performance. To investigate the slice performance, each slice evaluation was performed. Methods We trained our model using a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([F-18]FDG) PET/CT dataset obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database and tested the model with a Severance Hospital dataset. We applied slice selective learning to reduce computational cost and to extract unbiased features. We extracted features of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and normal cognitive (NC) condition using a Boundary Equilibrium Generative Adversarial Network (BEGAN) for stable convergence. Then, we utilized these features to train a support vector machine (SVM) classifier to distinguish AD from NC. Results The slice range that covered the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) using double slices showed the best performance. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of our proposed network was 94.33%, 91.78%, and 97.06% using the Severance dataset and 94.82%, 92.11%, and 97.45% using the ADNI dataset. The performance on the two independent datasets showed no statistical difference (p > 0.05). Moreover, there was a statistical difference in the performance between using two slices and one slice as input (p < 0.05). Conclusions Our model learned the generalized features of AD and NC for external validation when appropriate slices were selected. This study showed the feasibility of this model with consistent performance when tested using datasets acquired from a variety of image-acquisition environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据