4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

STRIPPING AND DISSIPATION TECHNIQUES FOR THE REMOVAL OF DISSOLVED GASES FROM ANAEROBIC EFFLUENTS

期刊

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 713-721

出版社

BRAZILIAN SOC CHEMICAL ENG
DOI: 10.1590/0104-6632.20160334s20150291

关键词

Dissipation chamber, Stripping; Dissolved methane; Hydrogen sulphide; Gaseous emissions; UASB reactor

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais - FAPEMIG
  2. Centro Federal de Educacao Tecnologica de Minas Gerais - CEFET-MG
  3. Companhia de Sane-amento de Minas Gerais - COPASA
  4. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - CNPq
  5. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos - FINEP
  6. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - CAPES

向作者/读者索取更多资源

UASB reactors are a common technology for wastewater treatment. However, certain disadvantages must be considered. One of the disadvantages relates to the presence of dissolved gases, hydrogen sulfide and methane, in the effluent, which can potentially be released into the atmosphere. This can cause malodours and contribute to the greenhouse effect. In this perspective, this work investigated alternative techniques to minimize these disadvantages: air stripping inside the settling compartment; and a dissipation chamber immediately after the reactor outlet. Results achieved with the air stripping technique showed low removal efficiencies for methane, around 30%, and in the range of 40 to 60% for hydrogen sulfide. On the other hand, the removal efficiencies obtained with the dissipation chamber technique were much higher, consistently reaching 60% or more for both gases, plus a relatively lower exhaust flow. For the best operational condition tested, median removal efficiencies of 73 and 97% were observed for dissolved methane and dissolved sulfide, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据