4.6 Article

Protein expression in the obligate hydrocarbon-degrading psychrophile Oleispira antarctica RB-8 during alkane degradation and cold tolerance

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 1870-1883

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14956

关键词

-

资金

  1. Eastern Academic Research Consortium (Eastern ARC)
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/R016569/1]
  3. European Commission of the Horizon 2020 project `INMARE' [634486]
  4. NERC [NE/R016569/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In cold marine environments, the obligate hydrocarbon-degrading psychrophile Oleispira antarctica RB-8, which utilizes aliphatic alkanes almost exclusively as substrates, dominates microbial communities following oil spills. In this study, LC-MS/MS shotgun proteomics was used to identify changes in the proteome induced during growth on n-alkanes and in cold temperatures. Specifically, proteins with significantly higher relative abundance during growth on tetradecane (n-C-14) at 16 degrees C and 4 degrees C have been quantified. During growth on n-C-14, O. antarctica expressed a complete pathway for the terminal oxidation of n-alkanes including two alkane monooxygenases, two alcohol dehydrogenases, two aldehyde dehydrogenases, a fatty-acid-CoA ligase, a fatty acid desaturase and associated oxidoreductases. Increased biosynthesis of these proteins ranged from 3- to 21-fold compared with growth on a non-hydrocarbon control. This study also highlights mechanisms O. antarctica may utilize to provide it with ecological competitiveness at low temperatures. This was evidenced by an increase in spectral counts for proteins involved in flagella structure/output to overcome higher viscosity, flagella rotation to accumulate cells and proline metabolism to counteract oxidative stress, during growth at 4 degrees C compared with 16 degrees C. Such species-specific understanding of the physiology during hydrocarbon degradation can be important for parameterizing models that predict the fate of marine oil spills.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据