4.7 Article

Improvement of magnetic and cryogenic energy preservation performances in a feeding-power-free superconducting magnet system for maglevs

期刊

ENERGY
卷 190, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116403

关键词

Energy preservation; Energy conversion; Persistent current; Superconducting magnet; Cryogenics; Maglev

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51707120]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [17511102306]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work relates to improvement of magnetic and cryogenic energy preservation performances in an on-board high-temperature superconducting magnet system used in linear synchronous motors for ultra-high speed maglevs. Since maglevs remove all the physical contacts to the ground, the wireless on-board feeding power is rather limited especially for superconducting subassemblies. And it has become one of the development bottlenecks. For the magnet system, realization of on-board feeding-power free is pivotal, which is regarding to two important energy conversions: electrical to magnetic energy by persistent-current mode of superconductivity, and latent heat to effective cooling (or cryogenic) energy by alpha-beta phase transition of solid nitrogen (SN2) in the system. Improvements of the two energy conversions are the main work. Firstly, model and numerical approach of persistent-current mode are proposed, followed by simulation of SN2 cooling. Then performances of persistent-current mode and cryogenic energy preservation are reported. Energy conversion efficiency is also analyzed for a strategy to improve cooling performance. The strategy successfully extends cryogenic energy preservation time to 8.83 h and suppresses thermal non-uniformity to <0.1 K. The enhanced cooling performance is also reflected in a prolonged persistent-current mode lasting for 8.17 h. The work demonstrates the applicability of the magnet system. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据