4.7 Article

Simulation studies on microwave-assisted pyrolysis of biomass for bioenergy production with special attention on waveguide number and location

期刊

ENERGY
卷 190, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116474

关键词

Microwave; Electromagnetic field; Simulation; Biomass; Pyrolysis; Bioenergy

资金

  1. TNB Seed Fund, Malaysia [U-TR-RD-18-11]
  2. iRMC UNITEN through publication fund BOLD 2025, Malaysia [RJO10436494]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, R.O.C. [MOST 106-2923-E-006-002-MY3, MOST 108-3116-F-006-007-CC1]
  4. Higher Education Sprout Project, Ministry of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The societys concern has moved toward sustainability nowadays and hence, the conversion of biomass into biofuels, through pyrolysis process, is one of the current research trends. Green processing technologies, like microwave heating, has been suggested to replace the conventional heating for biomass conversion as it provides energy-efficient heating and reduces time consumption. In this work, COMSOL Multiphysics software was used to study the effects of the waveguide position (bottom-fed vs side-fed) and unit (single-fed vs double-fed) on the electromagnetic field and heat distribution profile within the sample. Based on the results, the double-fed microwave can achieve higher maximum temperature (462 degrees C) at the same simulation time, followed by the single bottom-fed reactor (404 degrees C). An extension to the investigated work with more than two waveguides has shown that it will neither improve the electric field distribution nor increase the maximum temperature. This work concludes that both the position and unit of the waveguide are highly influential factors in determining the quality and speed of the biomass heating process. The double-fed microwave is the most suitable design to accelerate the pyrolysis process. The assumption of this simulation study is further validated as there is only similar to 5% difference between simulations and experiments. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据