4.6 Article

A novel model-based state of charge estimation for lithium-ion battery using adaptive robust iterative cubature Kalman filter

期刊

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH
卷 177, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2019.105951

关键词

Lithium-ion battery; State of charge; Iterated cubature; Kalman filter; Improved robust strategy; Auto-regressive and moving average model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61863007, 61863008]
  2. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [2016GXNSFDA380001, 2015GXNSFAA139297, 2O18GXNSFAA281161]
  3. Fundamental Ability Enhancement Project for Young and Middle-aged University Teachers in Guangxi Province [2017KY0865]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate and robust state of charge (SOC) estimation is the key evaluation index for battery management system (BMS) in electric vehicles (EVs). To improve the SOC estimation precision and reliability, a novel model-based estimation approach has been proposed. Firstly, the dynamic property of lithium-ion battery (LIB) is approximated by the auto-regressive and moving average (ARMA) model which compensates the measurement errors of terminal voltage and discharge current. Secondly, a variant of the Kalman filter (KF), namely improved cubature Kalman filter (CKF) based on the combination of singular value decomposition (SVD) and Gauss Newton iterative technology is employed to develop a reliable estimator for SOC. Furthermore, an adaptive robust strategy is used to improve anti-interference performance by accounting for bidirectional adjustment of observation covariance and gain matrix. Finally, the Dynamic Stress Test (DST) and Federal Urban Driving Schedule (FUDS) are loaded on LIB to test the validity of the improved approach. The experiment results demonstrate the effectiveness of the combination of ARMA model and filtering method in terms of SOC estimation. Besides, simulated measurement noise is added to the test data to prove the robustness of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据