4.6 Article

Aerobic Endurance Exercise Ameliorates Renal Vascular Sclerosis in Aged Mice by Regulating PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway

期刊

DNA AND CELL BIOLOGY
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 310-320

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/dna.2019.4966

关键词

aging; renal vascular sclerosis; aerobic endurance exercise; PI3K; AKT; mTOR; apoptosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Renal vascular sclerosis caused by aging plays an important role in the occurrence and development of chronic kidney disease. Clinical studies have confirmed that endurance exercise is able to delay the aging of skeletal muscle and brain tissue. However, to date, few studies have assessed whether endurance exercise is able to improve the occurrence of renal vascular sclerosis caused by natural aging and its related mechanisms. In this study, we investigated the protective effect of aerobic endurance exercise on renal vascular sclerosis in aged mice and its effect on the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/AKT/mTOR) pathway. The results suggested that aerobic endurance exercise preserved kidney morphology and renal function. Glomerular basement membrane thickness was evidently increased, podocyte foot processes were effaced in aged mice, and aerobic endurance exercise significantly ameliorated the overall lesion range. The protein expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and JG12 was lower in the senile control group (OC group). The protein expression of VEGF and JG12 was significantly increased after aerobic endurance exercise. Furthermore, aerobic endurance exercise resulted in downregulation of Bax, Caspase 3, IL-6, and senescent cells and upregulation of Bcl-2. The upregulation of PI3K and its downstream signal molecules AKT and mTOR after aerobic endurance exercise was further observed. Our observations indicated that aerobic endurance exercise may inhibit renal vascular sclerosis in aged mice by regulating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据