4.7 Article

Novel Detection and Restorative Levodopa Treatment for Preclinical Diabetic Retinopathy

期刊

DIABETES
卷 69, 期 7, 页码 1518-1527

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db19-0869

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs [CDA-2: RX002928, CDA-2: RX002342, IK6-RX003134, P30-EY-006360]
  2. Center for Scientific Review [P30-EY-006360]
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness
  4. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research & Development Service [I01-RX2615]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is diagnosed clinically by directly viewing retinal vascular changes during ophthalmoscopy or through fundus photographs. However, electroretinography (ERG) studies in humans and rodents have revealed that retinal dysfunction is demonstrable prior to the development of visible vascular defects. Specifically, delays in dark-adapted ERG oscillatory potential (OP) implicit times in response to dim-flash stimuli (<-1.8 log cd center dot s/m(2)) occur prior to clinically recognized DR. Animal studies suggest that retinal dopamine deficiency underlies these early functional deficits. In this study, we randomized individuals with diabetes, without clinically detectable retinopathy, to treatment with either low- or high-dose Sinemet (levodopa plus carbidopa) for 2 weeks and compared their ERG findings with those of control subjects (no diabetes). We assessed dim-flash-stimulated OP delays using a novel handheld ERG system (RETeval) at baseline and 2 and 4 weeks. RETeval recordings identified significant OP implicit time delays in individuals with diabetes without retinopathy compared with age-matched control subjects (P< 0.001). After 2 weeks of Sinemet treatment, OP implicit times were restored to control values, and these improvements persisted even after a 2-week washout. We conclude that detection of dim-flash OP delays could provide early detection of DR and that Sinemet treatment may reverse retinal dysfunction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据