4.7 Article

Incorporation of Al2O3 into cellulose triacetate membranes to enhance the performance of pervaporation for desalination of hypersaline solutions

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 474, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2019.114198

关键词

Al2O3; Cellulose triacetate; Nanocomposite membrane; Pervaporation; Desalination

资金

  1. Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP)
  2. European Commission Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA), under the program: Erasmus Mundus Master in Membrane Engineering for sustainable world (EM3E-4SW) (FPA) [20162058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, nanocomposite membranes were prepared by incorporating alumina (Al2O3) nanoparticles into cellulose triacetate (CTA) membranes in order to enhance the performance of pervaporative desalination. The resulting membranes were characterized by SEM, TGA, water contact angle, water uptake, tensile strength, and FTIR. The desalination performance was investigated as a function of Al2O3 loading, feed temperature (ranging from 40 to 70 degrees C) and feed concentration (varying from 0 g/L to 90 g/L NaCl). Pervaporation (PV) experiments showed that incorporating 2% Al2O3 into a CTA membrane increased the water flux by 204% compared to pristine CTA (from 2.2 kg m(-2) h(-1) to 6.7 kg m(-2) h(-1)) for a 30 g/L NaCl feed solution at 70 degrees C, while the salt rejection remained above 99.8%. Moreover, when the CTA-2% Al2O3 nanocomposite membrane was tested with a 90 g/L feed solution, only 25% flux reduction without sacrificing the salt rejection. Furthermore, different feed concentration affected the activation energy of water molecules to diffuse through pristine CTA and CTA/Al2O3 nanocomposite membrane. However, the nanocomposite membrane has a lower apparent activation energy even at high NaCI concentrations, compared to the pristine CTA. This suggests that the developed CTA/Al2O3 nanocomposite membrane is suitable for desalting hypersaline water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据