4.6 Article

Three-body wear of 3D printed temporary materials

期刊

DENTAL MATERIALS
卷 35, 期 12, 页码 1805-1812

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.10.005

关键词

3D printing; Additive manufacturing; Temporary dental materials; Wear

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the three-body wear of different additively manufactured temporary materials, one temporary PMMA material for CAD/CAM milling and one resin-based composite for direct restorations as a control group by using an ACTA machine. Methods. Specimens (n =8) of the 3D printing materials 3Delta temp, NextDent C&B, Freeprint temp were additively manufactured by DLP 3D printer. Postprocessing was carried out according to the manufacturer's specifications. Telio CAD were cut out of blocks, Tetric EvoCeram was applied directly and light cured. Three-body wear was simulated with an ACTA machine. Data were statistically analysed (ANOVA, post hoc test: Tukey, p < 0.05). The worn surfaces of the specimens were examined with a FE-SEM. Results. The average mean wear was 50 +/- 15 mu m for Tetric EvoCeram< 62 +/- 4 mu m for 3Delta temp <236 +/- 31 mu m for Telio CAD < 255 +/- 13 mu m for NextDent C&B < 257 +/- 24 mu m for Freeprint temp. After 200,000 cycles, the wear and wear rates for Tetric EvoCeram and 3Delta temp were significantly lower than those for the other materials. SEM revealed that 3Delta temp has a higher filler proportion than the other 3D printing materials but less than Tetric EvoCeram. Significance. The filler content influences the wear behaviour of additively manufactured materials as well as dental restorative composite materials. While most 3D printing materials have a low inorganic filler load, which qualifies the materials for temporary use only, one 3D printing material has an optimized composition that would qualify the material for longer clinical service time if wear is considered as the outcome variable. (C) 2019 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据