4.5 Review

RNA expression studies in stroke: what can they tell us about stroke mechanism?

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 24-29

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000786

关键词

biomarker; gene expression; immune response; ischemic stroke; microRNA; RNA; stroke

资金

  1. CIHR
  2. NIH
  3. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
  4. Hypertension Canada
  5. CFI
  6. UHF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Diagnosis of stroke and understanding the mechanism of stroke is critical to implement optimal treatment. RNA expressed in peripheral blood cells is emerging as a precision biomarker to aid in stroke diagnosis and prediction of stroke cause. In this review, we summarize available data regarding the role of RNA to predict stroke, the rationale for these changes, and a discussion of novel mechanistic insight and clinical applications. Recent findings Differences in RNA gene expression in blood have been identified in patients with stroke, including differences to distinguish ischemic from hemorrhagic stroke, and differences between cardioembolic, large vessel atherosclerotic, and small vessel lacunar stroke cause. Gene expression differences show promise as novel stroke biomarkers to predict stroke of unclear cause (cryptogenic stroke). The differences in RNA expression provide novel insight to stroke mechanism, including the role of immune response and thrombosis in human stroke. Important insight to regulation of gene expression in stroke and its causes are being acquired, including alternative splicing, noncoding RNA, and microRNA. Improved diagnosis of stroke and determination of stroke cause will improve stroke treatment and prevention. RNA biomarkers show promise to aid in the diagnosis of stroke and cause determination, as well as providing novel insight to mechanism of stroke in patients. While further study is required, an RNA profile may one day be part of the stroke armamentarium with utility to guide acute stroke therapy and prevention strategies and refine stroke phenotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据