4.6 Review

Fungi in archives, libraries, and museums: a review on paper conservation and human health

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 45, 期 5-6, 页码 686-700

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1040841X.2019.1690420

关键词

Fungi; archives; libraries; paper conservation; human health

资金

  1. FCT Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, I.P. [SFRH/BD/36005/2007, SFRH/BD/72216/2010, PTDC/EPH-PAT/0224/2014]
  2. VICARTE Research Unit [UID/EAT/00729/2013]
  3. FEDER -Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional funds through the COMPETE 2020 -Operational Programme for Competitiveness and Internationalization (POCI) [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-PTDC/EPHPAT/3345/2014]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/36005/2007, UID/EAT/00729/2013, SFRH/BD/72216/2010, PTDC/EPH-PAT/0224/2014] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The action of fungi on books, documents, maps, and works of art on paper can result in inestimable cultural losses. Plus, some of the fungi present in paper documents, surfaces and air from archives, libraries and museums are also a threat to human health. This work aims to review the literature on the most important and frequent microfungal populations found in paper-based collections all over the world, and correlate these data with human health risks. A total of 71 studies, dating between 1997 and 2018 were reviewed and organized. From 27 different countries, 207 fungal genera and 580 species were reported. Chaetomium sp. and Fusarium sp. were found to be special contaminants in the air of archives and have been associated with paper biodeterioration. The most common fungi reported (e.g. Penicillium, Aspergillus, and Alternaria species) have an impact on paper conservation but can also cause adverse human health effects. The most frequent fungal species retrieved from discoloured paper materials are discussed in greater detail. Considerations on methods of identification and quantification of fungal contamination are also presented. Finally, the authors acknowledge an urgent need for standardizing research in this area and further studies are proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据