4.6 Article

Identification of nonlinear kinetics of macroscopic bio-reactions using multilinear Gaussian processes

期刊

COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 133, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106671

关键词

Gaussian process; Model selection; Parameter estimation; Monod model; Kinetics; Macroscopic modeling; Nonlinear systems

资金

  1. VINNOVA Competence Centre AdBIOPRO [2016-05181]
  2. Swedish Research Council through the research environment NewLEADS - New Directions in Learning Dynamical Systems [2016-06079]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In biological systems, nonlinear kinetic relationships between metabolites of interest are modeled for various purposes. Usually, little a priori knowledge is available in such models. Identifying the unknown kinetics is, therefore, a critical step which can be very challenging due to the problems of (i) model selection and (ii) nonlinear parameter estimation. In this paper, we aim to address these problems systematically in a framework based on multilinear Gaussian processes using a family of kernels tailored to typical behaviours of modulation effects such as activation and inhibition or combinations thereof. Using one such process as a model for each modulation effect leads to a much more flexible model than conventional parametric models, e.g., the Monod model. The resulting models of the modulation effects can also be used as a starting point for estimating parametric kinetic models. As each modulation effect is modeled separately, this task is greatly simplified compared to the conventional approach where the parameters in all modulation functions have to be estimated simultaneously. We also show how the type of modulation effect can be selected automatically by way of regularization, thus by-passing the model selection problem. The resulting parameter estimates can be used as initial estimates in the conventional approach where the full model is estimated. Numerical experiments, including fed-batch simulations, are conducted to demonstrate our methods. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据