4.5 Article

Effects of Bisoprolol Transdermal Patches for Prevention of Perioperative Myocardial Injury in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery-Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study -Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study-

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 84, 期 4, 页码 642-649

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0871

关键词

Bisoprolol transdermal patch; High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T; Perioperative myocardial injury

资金

  1. TOA EIYO LTD.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transdermal beta-blocker patches, which offer stable blood concentration and easy availability during operation, for prevention of perioperative myocardial injury (PMI) in high-risk patients. Methods and Results: In this randomized controlled trial, patients aged >60 years with hypertension and high revised cardiac risk index (>= 2) undergoing non-cardiac surgery were randomly assigned to a bisoprolol patch or control group. Primary efficacy outcome was incidence of PMI, defined as postoperative high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) >0.014ng/mL and relative hs-cTnT change >= 20%. Secondary efficacy outcomes were number of cardiovascular events and 30-day mortality. From November 2014 to February 2019, 240 patients from 5 hospitals were enrolled in this study. The incidence of PMI was 35.7% in the bisoprolol patch group and 44.5% in the control group (P=0.18). Incidence of major adverse cardiac events including non-critical myocardial infarction, strokes, decompensated heart failure and tachyarrhythmia was similar between the 2 groups. Tachyarrhythmia tended to be higher in the control group. There were no significant differences in safety outcomes including significant hypotension and bradycardia requiring any treatment between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Bisoprolol patches do not influence the incidence of PMI and cardiovascular events in high-risk patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, but perioperative use of these patches is safe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据