4.7 Article

Multi-functional photocatalytic fuel cell for simultaneous removal of organic pollutant and chromium (VI) accompanied with electricity production

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 237, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124457

关键词

Photocatalytic fuel cell; Cr(VI) removal; Organic pollutant removal; Electricity production; Stability

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21878242, 21828802]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is of significant importance to realize the efficient wastewater treatment and energy recovery. This study presents a multi-functional photocatalytic fuel cell (PFC), which could reductively treat Cr(VI) contaminant and oxidatively degrade organic pollutant simultaneously along with electricity production in an economical strategy. TiO2 nanotube arrays (TNA) and graphite were used as photoanode and cathode in two separated chambers, respectively. The optimized PFC with open circuit voltage of 1.06 V, maximum power density of 1 W m(-2) and short circuit current density of 3.7 A m(-2) can be obtained by increasing Cr(VI) concentration and decreasing pH values in catholyte. Under optimized PFC conditions, more photogenerated electrons will be transferred to cathode for Cr(VI) reduction, and accelerating electron-hole separation in the photoanode, then facilitating the oxidation of organic pollutants on anode. More than 96.8% removal efficiency for 6.8 mM Cr(V1) with a cathodic efficiency of 95.1% can be achieved within 6 h. Methylene blue (MB), an organic model pollutant, is totally decolorized on photoanode, which is significantly improved compare to photocatalysis (61.5% removal efficiency). The stable cycle operation of this economical PFC has obtained owing to the stable and low cost materials of both photoanode and cathode. This work may provide an efficient and economical method to simultaneously remove two types of pollutants with electricity harvested in one cell. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据