4.7 Article

Plug flow approaching novel reactor employing in-situ dual effect of photocatalysis and photo-Fenton for the degradation of metronidazole

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 382, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122772

关键词

Plug flow reactor; In-situ dual effect; Composite beads; Metronidazole; Recyclability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The novel concept of fixed-bed in-situ continuous reactor approaching plug flow (PFR) has been employed for the degradation of Metronidazole (MTZ). Axial dispersion model has been employed to validate the exit age distribution. PFR modeled reactor was employed with novel composite beads composed of fullers earth and foundry sand encompassing the properties of the in-situ dual effect of both photocatalysis and photo-Fenton. The optimization was performed under the solar irradiations using reactors in series. Significant reduction in treatment time was achieved as dual effect took only 45 min for 84% removal optimized at three reactors in series with flow rate of 8 L h(-1), 75% area covered by the beads.Whereas individual processes of photo-Fenton and photocatalysis engaged nearly 3.5 h for merely 45% removal. The in-situ dual process exhibited 84% synergy, calculated in terms of the rate constant, over the individual processes. Various parameters including flow rate, number of reactors, H2O2 dose, the surface area covered by the beads, etc were optimized. 55% reduction in COD after the third reactor (in once-through mode) and formation of various ions substantiated the mineralization of MTZ into various small compounds. Results were extended to real effluent treatment using once through plug flow reactor approach. The tentative mechanism for the degradation of MTZ was also proposed. The industry viability of the reported process was demonstrated by recycling the composite beads up to 80 cycles and evaluating the approximate cost for the removal of the drug. Various characterizations like SEM, XRD, EDS, FT-IR, DRS confirmed the in-situ dual process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据