4.8 Article

Scalable fabrication of graphene-based laminate membranes for liquid and gas separations by crosslinking-induced gelation and doctor-blade casting

期刊

CARBON
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 129-137

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.08.058

关键词

Membrane separation; Graphene oxide; Gelation; Metal ions; Polyethylene oxide; Polyethyleneimine

资金

  1. GSK-EDB Trust Fund
  2. KAIST
  3. Singapore Economic Development Board

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene-based laminate membranes have recently demonstrated unique advantages over the traditional separation membranes made of polymers or ceramics. For both gas and liquid separations, various designs of crosslinker-stabilized graphene oxide (GO) membranes have been reported. However, the preparation methods used for those are poorly scalable for industrial applications. Herein, we report the fabrication of large-area (1333 cm(2)) GO-based membranes via doctor-blade casting of gel-like slurries prepared by incorporating calcium ions (Ca2+), ferric ions (Fe3+), polyethylene oxide (PEO), or polyethyleneimine (PEI) as crosslinkers. We found that all crosslinkers tested are suitable for the gelation of dilute GO dispersions (1-5mg/mL) for doctor-blade casting. Besides, all crosslinked-GO membranes demonstrated outstanding stability under sonication compared to a GO-only membrane prepared via vacuum-assisted filtration. In aqueous nanofiltration tests, Fe3+-crosslinked GO membranes achieved virtually complete rejection of different organic dyes. PEO-crosslinked GO membranes, on the other hand, exhibited an outstanding performance for the separation of carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrogen (N-2) gases with a CO2/N-2 selectivity of 52. Given the scaleup potential of doctor-blade casting and the practicality of crosslinking-based gelation approach, the proposed approach is promising to increase the industrial relevance of GO-based laminate membranes. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据