Negotiating bodily sensations between patients and GPs in the context of standardized cancer patient pathways – an observational study in primary care
出版年份 2020 全文链接
标题
Negotiating bodily sensations between patients and GPs in the context of standardized cancer patient pathways – an observational study in primary care
作者
关键词
-
出版物
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -
出版商
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
发表日期
2020-01-17
DOI
10.1186/s12913-020-4893-4
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Shared decision making between patient and GP about referrals from primary care: Does gatekeeping make a difference?
- (2018) Alexandru M. Rotar et al. PLoS One
- Wishing to be perceived as a capable and resourceful person ‐ A qualitative study of melanoma patients’ experiences of the contact and interaction with healthcare professionals
- (2018) Cecilia Hultstrand Ahlin et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
- Impact of Patient Gender and Race and Physician Communication on Colorectal Cancer Diagnostic Visits in Primary Care
- (2018) Heather L. Rogers et al. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH
- Facilitating early diagnosis of lung cancer amongst primary care patients: The views of GPs
- (2017) R. Wagland et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
- Wasting the doctor's time? A video-elicitation interview study with patients in primary care
- (2017) Nadia Llanwarne et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Managing barriers to empathy in the clinical encounter: a qualitative interview study with GPs
- (2016) Frans AWM Derksen et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
- “Being a good patient” during times of illness as defined by adolescent patients with cancer
- (2016) Meaghann S. Weaver et al. CANCER
- The 2015 National Cancer Program in Sweden: Introducing standardized care pathways in a decentralized system
- (2016) Jens Wilkens et al. HEALTH POLICY
- Promoting Help-Seeking in Response to Symptoms amongst Primary Care Patients at High Risk of Lung Cancer: A Mixed Method Study
- (2016) Richard Wagland et al. PLoS One
- The Danish cancer pathway for patients with serious non-specific symptoms and signs of cancer–a cross-sectional study of patient characteristics and cancer probability
- (2015) Mads Lind Ingeman et al. BMC CANCER
- Breast cancer patients’ narrative experiences about communication during the oncology care process: a qualitative study
- (2015) A. Abt Sacks et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
- Juggling efficiency. An ethnographic study exploring healthcare seeking practices and institutional logics in Danish primary care settings
- (2015) Rikke Sand Andersen et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Risk factors for delay in symptomatic presentation: a survey of cancer patients
- (2014) L J L Forbes et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Multiple perspectives on symptom interpretation in primary care research
- (2013) Marianne Rosendal et al. BMC Family Practice
- Secondary care intervals before and after the introduction of urgent referral guidelines for suspected cancer in Denmark: a comparative before-after study
- (2013) Mette Bach Larsen et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Consultation and illness behaviour in response to symptoms: A comparison of models from different disciplinary frameworks and suggestions for future research directions
- (2013) Sally Wyke et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Differences according to educational level in the management and survival of colorectal cancer in Sweden
- (2011) Nina Cavalli-Björkman et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Malignant melanoma: gender patterns in care seeking for suspect marks
- (2011) Senada Hajdarevic et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
- Cancer diagnosis in primary care
- (2010) William Hamilton BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
- Asymmetrical knowledge claims in general practice consultations with frequently attending patients: Limitations and opportunities for patient participation
- (2009) Steven M. Ariss SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started