4.7 Article

The genomic diversification of grapevine clones

期刊

BMC GENOMICS
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-6211-2

关键词

Clonal propagation; DNA methylation; Genome diversification; Somatic mutations; Structural variation; Transposable elements

资金

  1. College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences (UC Davis)
  2. NSF PGRP grant [1741627]
  3. Louis P. Martini Endowment in Viticulture
  4. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1741627] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Vegetatively propagated clones accumulate somatic mutations. The purpose of this study was to better appreciate clone diversity and involved defining the nature of somatic mutations throughout the genome. Fifteen Zinfandel winegrape clone genomes were sequenced and compared to one another using a highly contiguous genome reference produced from one of the clones, Zinfandel 03. Results: Though most heterozygous variants were shared, somatic mutations accumulated in individual and subsets of clones. Overall, heterozygous mutations were most frequent in intergenic space and more frequent in introns than exons. A significantly larger percentage of CpG, CHG, and CHH sites in repetitive intergenic space experienced transition mutations than in genic and non-repetitive intergenic spaces, likely because of higher levels of methylation in the region and because methylated cytosines often spontaneously deaminate. Of the minority of mutations that occurred in exons, larger proportions of these were putatively deleterious when they occurred in relatively few clones. Conclusions: These data support three major conclusions. First, repetitive intergenic space is a major driver of clone genome diversification. Second, clones accumulate putatively deleterious mutations. Third, the data suggest selection against deleterious variants in coding regions or some mechanism by which mutations are less frequent in coding than noncoding regions of the genome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据