4.7 Article

CoMeBack: DNA methylation array data analysis for co-methylated regions

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 36, 期 9, 页码 2675-2683

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa049

关键词

-

资金

  1. ERA-NET 'A Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life' (JPI HDHL, NutriPROGRAM project) [CIHR NTE-160943]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivation: High-dimensional DNA methylation (DNAm) array coverage, while sparse in the context of the entire DNA methylome, still constitutes a very large number of CpG probes. The ensuing multiple-test corrections affect the statistical power to detect associations, likely contributing to prevalent limited reproducibility. Array probes measuring proximal CpG sites often have correlated levels of DNAm that may not only be biologically meaningful but also imply statistical dependence and redundancy. New methods that account for such correlations between adjacent probes may enable improved specificity, discovery and interpretation of statistical associations in DNAm array data. Results: We developed a method named Co-Methylation with genomic CpG Background (CoMeBack) that estimates DNA co-methylation, defined as proximal CpG probes with correlated DNAm across individuals. CoMeBack outputs co-methylated regions (CMRs), spanning sets of array probes constructed based on all genomic CpG sites, including those not measured on the array, and without any phenotypic variable inputs. This approach can reduce the multiple-test correction burden, while enhancing the discovery and specificity of statistical associations. We constructed and validated CMRs in whole blood, using publicly available Illumina Infinium 450 K array data from over 5000 individuals. These CMRs were enriched for enhancer chromatin states, and binding site motifs for several transcription factors involved in blood physiology. We illustrated how CMR-based epigenome-wide association studies can improve discovery and reduce false positives for associations with chronological age.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据