4.6 Article

Enhanced oxidase-like activity of selenium nanoparticles stabilized by chitosan and application in a facile colorimetric assay for mercury (II)

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2019.107384

关键词

Selenium nanoparticles; Chitosan; Oxidase-like activity; Hg(II); Colorimetric assay

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21771068]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [2017KFYXJJ167]
  3. Analytical and Testing Center of School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanozymes, nanomaterials with intrinsic enzyme-like activity, have gained tremendous attention due to their advantages. Our previous study found that selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) synthesized with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a stabilizer had intrinsic oxidase-like activity, which could catalyze the oxidation of oxidase substrate 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine by oxygen. However, the catalytic activity of as-synthesized SeNPs was not very high, which greatly limits their applications. Herein, to improve the oxidase-like activity of SeNPs, SeNPs were synthesized using three types of stabilizers (BSA, chitosan (CS) and sodium alginate (SA)). The catalytic activity of CS-stabilized SeNPs (CS-SeNPs) with the most positive surface charge was 4-fold of BSA-stabilized SeNPs (BSA-SeNPs), but that of SA-stabilized SeNPs with negative surface charge was the weakest. Subsequent reactive oxygen capture experiments and electron spin resonance detection showed that superoxide anion and hydroxyl radical might be involved in the catalytic mechanism of CS-SeNPs. Finally, on the basis of the inhibition of Hg2+ on the oxidase-like activity of CS-SeNPs, a simple and economical colorimetric method for Hg2+ detection was achieved with a detection limit of 0.12 mu M. The results provide a new clue for improving oxidase-like activity of nanomaterials and broaden the potential application of SeNPs in chemical sensor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据