4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

The evolution of magnetic field and spin-down of young pulsars

期刊

ASTRONOMISCHE NACHRICHTEN
卷 340, 期 9-10, 页码 1023-1029

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/asna.201913710

关键词

PSR J1640-4631; toroidal magnetic field; TPW heating

资金

  1. Innovation Team Foundation of the Education Department [[2014]35]
  2. Science and Technology Innovation Talent Team [(2015)0415]
  3. Doctoral Starting up Foundation of Guizhou Normal University 2017 [GZNUD[2017]33]
  4. Technology Department of Guizhou Province Fund [[2019]1220]
  5. [(2016)-4008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here, we summarize our recent work on the evolution of magnetic field and spin-down of young pulsars including high-B pulsars and magnetars. Our work includes the following three parts: (a) Based on the estimated ages of their potentially associated supernova remnants (SNRs), we estimate the values of the mean braking indices of eight magnetars with SNRs and find that five magnetars have smaller mean braking indices of 1 n < 3, and we interpret them within a combination of magnetodipole radiation and wind-aided braking. (b) The low braking index of n = 0.9(2) for PSR J1734-3333 could undergo a supercritical accretion soon after its formation in a supernova explosion. The buried multipole magnetic fields will merge into a dipole magnetic field. Retaining the current field growth index epsilon = 1.34, this pulsar will become a magnetar with dB(p)similar to 6.2(2) x 10(14) G and dB(p)similar to 1.06(4) x 10(15) G after 50 kyrs and 100 kys, respectively. (c) By introducing a mean rotation energy conversion coefficient and combining the pulsar's high-energy and timing observations with a reliable nuclear equation of state, we estimate the initial spin period, initial dipole magnetic field, and true age of PSR J1640-4631. For this source, its measured high braking index n = 3.15(3) is attributed to a long-term dipole magnetic field decay, and its soft X-ray emission is attributed to anisotropic heating.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据