Public availability of results of observational studies evaluating an intervention registered at ClinicalTrials.gov
出版年份 2016 全文链接
标题
Public availability of results of observational studies evaluating an intervention registered at ClinicalTrials.gov
作者
关键词
Observational studies, Trial registration, Waste in research
出版物
BMC Medicine
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -
出版商
Springer Nature
发表日期
2016-01-19
DOI
10.1186/s12916-016-0551-4
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions
- (2015) Christopher W. Halladay et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Reporting Discrepancies Between the ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database and Peer-Reviewed Publications
- (2014) Daniel M. Hartung et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research
- (2014) An-Wen Chan et al. LANCET
- Making Prospective Registration of Observational Research a Reality
- (2014) R. Dal-Re et al. Science Translational Medicine
- Infrequent and incomplete registration of test accuracy studies: analysis of recent study reports
- (2014) Daniël A Korevaar et al. BMJ Open
- Impact of sending email reminders of the legal requirement for posting results on ClinicalTrials.gov: cohort embedded pragmatic randomized controlled trial
- (2014) A. Maruani et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Improving the Transparency of Prognosis Research: The Role of Reporting, Data Sharing, Registration, and Protocols
- (2014) George Peat et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Observational Studies: Getting Clear about Transparency
- (2014) PLOS MEDICINE
- Public Availability of Results of Trials Assessing Cancer Drugs in the United States
- (2013) Thi-Anh-Hoa Nguyen et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
- (2013) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
- Timing and Completeness of Trial Results Posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and Published in Journals
- (2013) Carolina Riveros et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- The Importance of Potential Studies That Have Not Existed and Registration of Observational Data Sets
- (2012) John P. A. Ioannidis JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Evolution of Clinical Trials Registries
- (2011) Ralph M. Meyer JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Need to realign patient-oriented and commercial and academic research
- (2011) Alessandro Liberati LANCET
- Registration of observational studies: Is it time?
- (2010) R. J. Williams et al. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
- Should protocols for observational research be registered?
- (2010) The Lancet LANCET
- Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials
- (2009) Sylvain Mathieu JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Presentation of Nonfinal Results of Randomized Controlled Trials at Major Oncology Meetings
- (2009) Christopher M. Booth et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Association of trial registration with the results and conclusions of published trials of new oncology drugs
- (2009) Nicolas Rasmussen et al. Trials
- Trial Publication after Registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
- (2009) Joseph S. Ross et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Opportunities for Enhancing the FDA Guidance on Pharmacovigilance
- (2008) Bruce M. Psaty JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy
- (2008) Erick H. Turner et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
- (2008) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
- MEDICINE: Moving Toward Transparency of Clinical Trials
- (2008) D. A. Zarin et al. SCIENCE
- Reporting Bias in Drug Trials Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: Review of Publication and Presentation
- (2008) Kristin Rising et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started