4.7 Article

On the catalytic role of superficial VOx, species and coke deposited on mesoporous MgO replica in oxidative dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 504, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144336

关键词

Nanoreplication; Coke deposition; Magnesium vanadate; Regeneration; Oxidative dehydrogenation; Styrene production

资金

  1. Polish National Science Centre [2016/20/T/ST5/00256, 2013/09/B/ST5/03419]
  2. European Regional Development Fund in the framework of the Polish Innovation Economy Operational Program [POIG.02.01.00-12-023/08]
  3. MINECO [MAT2016-80285-p]
  4. GV [PROMETEOII/2014/004]
  5. H2020 (MSCA-RISE-2016/NanoMed Project)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesoporous MgO was synthesized by the nanoreplication method using CMK-3 carbon as a hard template and magnesium nitrate as a metal oxide precursor. The produced support was modified with different amounts of ammonium metavanadate solution. Various distributions of V-containing species on the MgO surface were found by XRD, low-temperature adsorption of N-2, TEM, XPS and UV-vis-DR spectroscopy. At low V loadings isolated VO4 dominated. Increasing V content resulted in clustering of VO4 species and the formation of Mg3V2O8 crystallites. As found in temperature-programmed reduction (H-2-TPR), the latter phase was clearly harder in reduction by H-2 compared to highly dispersed VO4 forms. The developed materials appeared to be very active catalysts of oxidative dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene (ODH). The optimal catalytic performance was observed for the sample containing 10 wt% of vanadium. The initial ethylbenzene conversion of 63.6% at selectivity to styrene of 86.9% was achieved at temperature as low as 500 degrees C. A notable influence of carbonaceous deposit formed during the ODH reaction on the catalytic activity was discussed, including presentation of both coexisting superficial reaction mechanisms. A reasonable regeneration procedure to recover lost activity was developed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据