4.7 Article

Few-layered vdW MoO3 for sensitive, uniform and stable SERS applications

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 507, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.145116

关键词

Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS); 2D material; Metal oxide; Stability; Intercalation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11574119, 51973244, 61934004]
  2. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [2019B151502049]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [201804010143]
  4. Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Display Material and Technology [2017B030314031]
  5. Research Grant of Guangdong Food and Drug Vocational College [2018ZR006, 2018PT002]
  6. Guangdong Medical Science and Technology Research Foundation [A2017462]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal oxides have been considered as active substrates for surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) through morphology-engineering and defect-introduction with the sacrifice of the uniformity and stability of the materials. In this work, large-size, few-layered (FL) wide band gap van der Waals (vdW) MoO3 nanosheets were prepared as SERS substrates. It's shown that the decrease of layer number converted the intrinsic MoO3 from non-SERS active to sensitive SERS substrate, with limit of detection (LOD) of 2 x 10(-8) M for R6G. The SERS of MoO3 showed high homogeneity with RSD as small as 2.95%, The Raman intensity of R6G on the SERS substrate remained higher than 90% after exposing in atmosphere for 160 days, demonstrating excellent air-stability. Experimental results demonstrated that the SERS effect of the plasmon-free MoO3 substrate comes from chemical enhancement mechanism (CM) when reducing its thickness. Furthermore, the CM effect can be further improved through non-destructive atomic intercalation into the vdW gap, resulting in more charges separation between the adsorbed molecules and substrates. Our result showed that non-destructive modulation strategy is effective for preparation of sensitive, uniform and stable SERS substrate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据