4.7 Article

Robust CNT-based conductive ultrafiltration membrane with tunable surface potential for in situ fouling mitigation

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 497, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143786

关键词

Membrane fouling; Conductive membrane; Surface potential; Electrostatic repulsion

资金

  1. National Key RD Plan [2016YFC0205700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1510202, 21506093, 21808107]
  3. Project for Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  4. Project for Marine Science and Technology Innovation of Jiangsu Province [HY2018-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A membrane filtration process assisted by an electric field is effective for removing charged foulants from the membrane surface. In this work, a robust and conductive carbon nanotube (CNT) network membrane was prepared by adding alumina nanoparticles (NPs). The interaction between the CNT and alumina were characterized. The results indicate that alumina NPs were assembled on the sidewall of CNT bundles. After sintering, the mechanical stability of the network was enhanced due to the formation of a chemical bond between the CNT and the alumina NPs. Humic acid (HA) solution purification experiments of the as-prepared membranes were carried out. The membrane potential was adjusted from 0 to -0.5 V, the membrane stationary permeance increased by 63.4% and 30.6%, when using HA and HA/Na2SO4 solutions, respectively. Simultaneously, the HA rejection performance of the membranes also increased with the applied potential. The membrane fouling mitigation and the performance improvement are ascribed to the electrostatic repulsion of the negative potential in the membrane and the negatively charged HA. The filtration performance of the CNT-based membrane was compared with other conventional membrane processes. The results further demonstrate that the performance of this reported membrane is competitive, especially with the assistance of an electric field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据