4.8 Article

Study on developing a novel continuous separation device and carbon dioxide separation by process of hydrate combined with chemical absorption

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 255, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113791

关键词

CO2 capture; Hydrate; Chemical absorption; Gas hydrate separation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51736009]
  2. Special project for Marine Economy Development of Guangdong Province [GDME2018D002]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0304002]
  4. National Natural Science Fund [51576202]
  5. CAS Science and Technology Apparatus Development Program [YZ201619]
  6. Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDJ-SSW-JSC033]
  7. National Natural Science Fund of Guangdong Province, China [2017A030313301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrate-based carbon dioxide (CO2) separation from gas mixture has been extensively investigated for it being process simple and environmentally friendly. However, as the concentration of CO2 in the gas mixture decreases, the condition of the hydrate formation becomes very harsh. Therefore, it is significantly difficult for a single hydrate-based method to separation CO2 completely. In this work, the first set of device for continuously separating CO2 from gas mixture was developed on the base of the method of hydrate combined with chemical absorption. The process feasibility of the combined method and the device were proved through experimental study on CO2 separation from integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) syngas. The experimental results also indicated CO2 could be completely separated from the balance component, and the estimated energy cost for CO2 separation with the combined method is about (sic)209 per ton CO2, which is lower than that with cryogenic separation process by about 30.0%. The study provides scientific data and theoretical guidance for the industrial application of hydrate-based CO2 separation and capture in future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据