4.4 Article

The Intensive Care Lifeboat: a survey of lay attitudes to rationing dilemmas in neonatal intensive care

期刊

BMC MEDICAL ETHICS
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12910-016-0152-y

关键词

Resource allocation; Intensive care units; Neonatal; Medical ethics; Questionnaires; Infant; Newborn; Resuscitation

资金

  1. Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics
  2. Wellcome trust [086041/Z/08/Z, WT106587/Z/14/Z]
  3. Wellcome Trust [086041/Z/08/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Resuscitation and treatment of critically ill newborn infants is associated with relatively high mortality, morbidity and cost. Guidelines relating to resuscitation have traditionally focused on the best interests of infants. There are, however, limited resources available in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), meaning that difficult decisions sometimes need to be made. This study explores the intuitions of lay people (non-health professionals) regarding resource allocation decisions in the NICU. Methods: The study design was a cross-sectional quantitative survey, consisting of 20 hypothetical rationing scenarios. There were 119 respondents who entered the questionnaire, and 109 who completed it. The respondents were adult US and Indian participants of the online crowdsourcing platform Mechanical Turk. Respondents were asked to decide which of two infants to treat in a situation of scarce resources. Demographic characteristics, personality traits and political views were recorded. Respondents were also asked to respond to a widely cited thought experiment involving rationing. Results: The majority of respondents, in all except one scenario, chose the utilitarian option of directing treatment to the infant with the higher chance of survival, higher life expectancy, less severe disability, and less expensive treatment. As discrepancy between outcomes decreased, however, there was a statistically significant increase in egalitarian responses and decrease in utilitarian responses in scenarios involving chance of survival (P = 0.001), life expectancy (P = 0.0001), and cost of treatment (P = 0.01). In the classic 'lifeboat' scenario, all but two respondents were utilitarian. Conclusions: This survey suggests that in situations of scarcity and equal clinical need, non-health professionals support rationing of life-saving treatment based on probability of survival, duration of survival, cost of treatment or quality of life. However, where the difference in prognosis or cost is very small, non-health professionals preferred to give infants an equal chance of receiving treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Ethics

Vaccine mandates for healthcare workers beyond COVID-19

Alberto Giubilini, Julian Savulescu, Jonathan Pugh, Dominic Wilkinson

Summary: The study provides ethical criteria for establishing the justifiability of vaccine mandates for healthcare workers, based on the utility of the vaccine for healthcare workers and patients, as well as the availability of alternative measures. The study argues that these mandates are not unfairly discriminatory and the level of coercion involved is ethically acceptable. However, the study concludes that there is currently insufficient evidence to justify COVID-19 vaccine mandates for healthcare workers.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS (2023)

Article Ethics

Affirmative action in healthcare resource allocation: Vaccines, ventilators and race

Hazem Zohny, Ben Davies, Dominic Wilkinson

Summary: This article discusses the potential justifications for employing affirmative action (AA) in healthcare, particularly in the context of the pandemic. It specifically focuses on AA in healthcare resource allocation (AARA), exploring whether the rationales used for race-based prioritization policies in education and employment apply to the COVID-19 pandemic. The article examines the differences between AA and AARA, as well as the implications of AARA for allocating vaccines and ventilators. It also considers practical approaches to implementing AARA and addresses key objections.

BIOETHICS (2022)

Editorial Material Ethics

Proportionality, wrongs and equipoise for natural immunity exemptions: response to commentators

Jonathan Pugh, Julian Savulescu, Rebecca C. H. Brown, Dominic Wilkinson

Summary: The authors express gratitude towards the commentators of their feature article and acknowledge the important questions raised regarding natural immunity exemptions to COVID-19 vaccine mandates. They agree with some points, such as the US-centric considerations and the need for clear justifications and supporting data for mandates. Due to space constraints, the article focuses on discussing hybrid immunity and addresses concerns about the appropriate standard of proof.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS (2022)

Book Review Ethics

Grief: A Philosophical Guide

Dominic Wilkinson

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHILOSOPHY (2023)

Review Clinical Neurology

The ethics of crowdfunding in paediatric neurology

Angus Livingstone, Laurent Servais, Dominic J. C. Wilkinson

Summary: In the past decade, crowdfunding has become a common way to raise funds for the treatment of rare disorders. However, it also raises ethical concerns. This review focuses on the ethical challenges crowdfunding poses in pediatric neurology, using gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy as an example. The article discusses the responsibilities of physicians and suggests actions that can be taken to reduce harms.

DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY (2023)

Editorial Material Ethics

Deferring Decision-making in the Face of Uncertainty

Dominic J. C. Wilkinson

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS (2022)

Article Ethics

Expanded terminal sedation in end-of-life care

Laura Gilbertson, Julian Savulescu, Justin Oakley, Dominic Wilkinson

Summary: Despite advances in palliative care, some patients still suffer significantly at the end of life. Terminal Sedation (TS) and Expanded TS (ETS) are used to alleviate suffering in dying patients, with ETS being used in cases that fall outside the usual limits. This paper explores and defends the moral permissibility of ETS in jurisdictions where assisted dying is lawful.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS (2023)

Article Ethics

The harm principle, personal identity and identity-relative paternalism

Dominic Wilkinson

Summary: Is it ethical to prevent patients from making choices that will harm themselves in the future? This paper explores Derek Parfit's arguments that challenge the distinction between harm to self and harm to others. It discusses cases of treatment refusal by capacitous patients and examines different forms of paternalism based on a reductionist view of personal identity. The author proposes an Identity Relative Paternalistic Intervention Principle and considers objections to this principle. While not always justifying intervention, there is a stronger ethical case for preventing harm to future selves than often recognized.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS (2023)

Article Pediatrics

End-of-life care over four decades in a quaternary neonatal intensive care unit

Alexandra Barry, Trisha Prentice, Dominic Wilkinson

Summary: There have been changes in both the causes of death and approaches to withdrawal of treatment in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) over the past four decades. The majority of infants now die after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, and deaths from chromosomal abnormalities, complications related to prematurity, and severe birth asphyxia have decreased.

JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH (2023)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Personal ethical settings for driverless cars and the utility paradox: An ethical analysis of public attitudes in UK and Japan

Kazuya Takaguchi, Andreas Kappes, James M. Yearsley, Tsutomu Sawai, Dominic J. C. Wilkinson, Julian Savulescu

Summary: Driverless cars have the potential to significantly reduce collisions and casualties on the roads, but there is controversy surrounding how they should be programmed to respond in unavoidable collisions. A study comparing the views of the general public in the UK and Japan found striking differences, with UK respondents preferring cars that prioritize saving lives while Japanese respondents preferred cars that prioritize saving pedestrians. The study suggests that providing a personal ethical setting may be the optimal approach for driverless cars to achieve the highest uptake.

PLOS ONE (2022)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Race and resource allocation: an online survey of US and UK adults' attitudes toward COVID-19 ventilator and vaccine distribution

Andreas Kappes, Hazem Zohny, Julian Savulescu, Ilina Singh, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Dominic Wilkinson

Summary: This study examined the attitudes of US/UK adults towards COVID-19 ventilator and vaccine allocation. The results showed that participant race did not affect vaccine or ventilator allocation decisions in the USA, but did impact ventilator allocation attitudes in the UK. In addition, the study found that participants' racial bias was strongly associated with race-based ventilator and vaccine allocations.

BMJ OPEN (2022)

Editorial Material Ethics

Ethical Withdrawal of ECMO Support Over the Objections of Competent Patients

Dominic Wilkinson, John Fraser, Jacky Suen, Mioko Kasagi Suzuki, Julian Savulescu

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS (2023)

Editorial Material Ethics

Expanding choice at the end of life

Dominic Wilkinson, Laura Gilbertson, Justin Oakley, Julian Savulescu

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS (2023)

Editorial Material Ethics

Implications of identity-relative paternalism

Dominic Wilkinson

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS (2023)

暂无数据