4.4 Article

Plant Growth-Promoting Active Metabolites from Frankia spp. of Actinorhizal Casuarina spp.

期刊

APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 191, 期 1, 页码 74-91

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12010-020-03243-8

关键词

Casuarina spp; Phytopathogens; Frankia spp; Bioactive metabolites; Phytohormones

资金

  1. Research Foundation of Bharathidasan University (URF) [02492/URF/K7/2016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In agriculture, plant growth enrichment via plant growth stimulating microbes has been recognized as an emergency, it is used as an alternatives to chemical pesticides and growth stimulants. The phytopathogens cause various diseases such as blister bark; stem cankers, and pink and brown rot diseases besides affect the growth frequency of Casuarina spp. toward biotic and abiotic stresses. Bio-control and plant growth-promoting potential of native Frankia isolates from Casuarina spp. in Tamil Nadu, India, was not much explored. Hence, in the present study, we are investigating the plant growth improvement activity and phytopathogen control in Casuarina spp. The Frankia sp. DDNSF-01 and Frankia casuarinae DDNSF-02 were isolated and identified from the root nodules of Casuarina spp. Additionally, it is recognized for plant growth promoter activity and in vitro antimicrobial activity against phytopathogens including Pseudomonas sp. and Colletotrichum sp. The plant growth regulators including IAA, siderophore, ammonia production, and phosphate solubilization were found out. Therefore, the formation of the most significant plant growth-promoting phytohormone IAA was confirmed by UV, FT-IR, TLC, HPLC, HPTLC, and NMR spectrum. Bioactive metabolites including methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate, dodecanoic acid, and some novel flavonoids were identified. Therefore, various growth regulators such as l-aspartic acid, H-1-indole-3-carboxaldehyde were confirmed by GC-MS spectra. The present findings conclude Frankia spp. as efficient plant growth enhancement mediator and also inhibit the phytopathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据