4.8 Article

Highly Stable Colorimetric Sensing by Assembly of Gold Nanoparticles with SYBR Green I: From Charge Screening to Charge Neutralization

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 92, 期 1, 页码 1455-1462

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04660

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21874093, 21475013]
  2. Sichuan Science and Technology Project [2018JY0466]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aggregation of plasmonic gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) has been widely used for label-free colorimetric sensing. Adding salt is a commonly used method to induce a color change, but salt-induced aggregation by charge screening is a slow kinetic process, making quantitative and reproducible measurement difficult. Herein, we explored an alternative method by charge neutralization using positively charged molecules, such as a DNA-staining dye, SYBR Green I (SG), for efficient and stable assembly of AuNPs. Even submicromolar SG effectively triggered the aggregation of AuNPs in less than 1 min, and the resulting intense blue color was stable for over 10 h. The charge neutralization effect of SG was confirmed with zeta potential measurements. Besides, pH-dependent aggregation of AuNPs by SG agreed well with the pKa of the nitrogen atoms responsible for the positive charges in the SG structure. Moreover, the charge neutralization effect was also observed from polycations such as polyamines. The SG-induced assembly of AuNPs was developed into a label-free colorimetric sensing platform. Benefiting from the intense blue color, this new sensing strategy allowed visual detection of as low as 0.1 nM DNA, 50-fold lower than that by salt. Such a charge neutralization strategy may inspire further thinking on fundamental colloidal science and its applications in analytical chemistry. This work itself significantly improved AuNP-based colorimetric sensors in terms of detection time, signal stability, and sensitivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据