4.8 Article

Achieving Both High Ionic Conductivity and High Interfacial Stability with the Li2+xC1-xBxO3 Solid-State Electrolyte: Design from Theoretical Calculations

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 6007-6014

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b22185

关键词

Li2+xC1-xBxO3; solid electrolyte; high interfacial stability; separator; solid-state lithium battery

资金

  1. One-Hundred Young Talents Program of Guangdong University of Technology [22041331901]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0700600]
  3. Soft Science Research Project of Guangdong Province [2017B030301013]
  4. Shenzhen Science and Technology Research Grant [ZDSYS201707281026184]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51703070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A crystalline solid electrolyte interphase Li2CO3 material with a large band gap shows promise toward next-generation all-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs). However, the inferior ionic diffusivity restricts such structures to a real battery setup. Herein, based on density functional theory calculation and Python materials genomics, we theoretically develop the chemistry and local structural motifs to build a mixed boron-carbon framework Li2+xC1-xBxO3 (LCBO). We examine the electrochemical and chemical stabilities of LCBO-electrode interfaces by analyzing the thermodynamics of formation of interfacial phases. Interestingly, the LCBO material is automatically protected from further decomposition through the self-generated resistive interphase (Li2CO3 and Li3BO3), which gives a wide range of operating potential. LCBO shows high interfacial stability with LiCoO2, LiMnO2, and LiMn2O4. More importantly, the theoretical Li-ion migration barrier of LCBO (x = 0.375) is approximately 0.23 +/- 0.02 eV through a cooperative migration mechanism. Therefore, the LCBO material combines high Li-ion diffusivity with good interfacial stability, which makes it a promising solid-state electrolyte material for ASSLBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据