4.7 Article

The study of properties and behavior of self compacting concrete containing Electric Arc Furnace Slag (EAFS) as aggregate

期刊

AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 231-243

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2019.10.001

关键词

Electric arc furnace slag; Self-compacting concrete; In-fresh properties; Long-term hardened properties; Sustained load testing

资金

  1. ViceRectorate of Investigation of the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) [PIF 2013]
  2. Junta de Castilla y Leon (Regional Government) - FEDER funds [BU119P17]
  3. MCIU/AEl/EU [RTI2018-097079-B-C31]
  4. UPV/EHU [PPGA19/61]
  5. Basque Government research group [IT1314-19]
  6. Vice-Rectorate of Investigation of the University of Burgos [SUCONS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electric Arc Furnace Slag (EAFS) can be efficiently reused as aggregate in the production of high-volume batches of hydraulic concrete mixes that show interesting properties in both the fresh and the hardened state. Mixtures containing EAFS aggregate in proportions of nearly 50% by volume are prepared for use as pumpable and self-compacting mixes with consistency classes of S4 and SF2, respectively. Characterization of the mixtures is presented, examining practical aspects such as thixotropy, segregation in the fresh state (under 6%), and mechanical and microstructural evolution in the hardened state. The results yielded compressive strengths of approximately 60 MPa and elastic moduli of 38 GPa after one year. Finally, real-scale flexural elements are cast and subjected to sustained loading tests of moderate intensity. Long-term deflection values were approximately 50% (pumpable mixes) and less than 40% (self-compacting mixes) of the maximum admissible values specified in current standards. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据