4.6 Review

Autophagic- and Lysosomal-Related Biomarkers for Parkinson's Disease: Lights and Shadows

期刊

CELLS
卷 8, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells8111317

关键词

Parkinson's disease; biomarker; autophagy; lysosome; glucocerebrosidase; alpha synuclein

资金

  1. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO, Spain) [SAF2015-73997-JIN, SAF2016-77541-R]
  2. La Caixa Banking Foundation [LCF/BQ/PR19/11700005, HR17-00513]
  3. CIBERNED
  4. Radboud University [BES-2017-080191]
  5. FPI from MINECO (Spain) [BES-2017-080191]
  6. MINECO (Spain) [SAF2015-73997-JIN]
  7. FEDER (E.U.)
  8. Junior Leader Program from La Caixa Banking Foundation [LCF/BQ/PR19/11700005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that currently affects 1% of the population over the age of 60 years, for which no disease-modifying treatments exist. This lack of effective treatments is related to the advanced stage of neurodegeneration existing at the time of diagnosis. Thus, the identification of early stage biomarkers is crucial. Biomarker discovery is often guided by the underlying molecular mechanisms leading to the pathology. One of the central pathways deregulated during PD, supported both by genetic and functional studies, is the autophagy-lysosomal pathway. Hence, this review presents different studies on the expression and activity of autophagic and lysosomal proteins, and their functional consequences, performed in peripheral human biospecimens. Although most biomarkers are inconsistent between studies, some of them, namely HSC70 levels in sporadic PD patients, and cathepsin D levels and glucocerebrosidase activity in PD patients carrying GBA mutations, seem to be consistent. Hence, evidence exists that the impairment of the autophagy-lysosomal pathway underlying PD pathophysiology can be detected in peripheral biosamples and further tested as potential biomarkers. However, longitudinal, stratified, and standardized analyses are needed to confirm their clinical validity and utility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据