4.6 Article

The Histone Demethylase LSD1/KDM1A Mediates Chemoresistance in Breast Cancer via Regulation of a Stem Cell Program

期刊

CANCERS
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers11101585

关键词

breast cancer stem cells; tumor heterogeneity; therapy resistance; combination therapy; self-renewal; tumor initiation; lysine-specific demethylase 1; KDM1A

类别

资金

  1. FONDATION SANTE, FP7 PEOPLE: MARIE CURIE ACTIONS [303519]
  2. European Operational Program Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning 2014-2020 [MIS 5004375]
  3. State Scholarships Foundation (IKY)
  4. ARCHERS framework (SNF-FORTH fellowships) [SNF-0031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the female population, despite advances in diagnosis and treatment. The highly heterogeneous nature of the disease represents a major obstacle to successful therapy and results in a significant number of patients developing drug resistance and, eventually, suffering from tumor relapse. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a small subset of tumor cells characterized by self-renewal, increased tumor-initiation capacity, and resistance to conventional therapies. As such, they have been implicated in the etiology of tumor recurrence and have emerged as promising targets for the development of novel therapies. Here, we show that the histone demethylase lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) plays an important role in the chemoresistance of breast cancer cells. Our data, from a series of in vitro and in vivo assays, advocate for LSD1 being critical in maintaining a pool of tumor-initiating cells that may contribute to the development of drug resistance. Combinatory administration of LSD1 inhibitors and anti-cancer drugs is more efficacious than monotherapy alone in eliminating all tumor cells in a 3D spheroid system. In conclusion, we provide compelling evidence that LSD1 is a key regulator of breast cancer stemness and a potential target for the design of future combination therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据