4.6 Article

Sustainability of Urban Development with Population Decline in Different Policy Scenarios: A Case Study of Northeast China

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 11, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su11226442

关键词

urban shrinkage; sustainable development; system dynamics; population decline; Northeast China

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA19040402]
  2. Natural Sciences Foundation of China [41530751]
  3. Early Career Talent Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences 'Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences' [2014042]
  4. IGSNRR, CAS [2016RC101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urban shrinkage is becoming a major global challenge and causing a series of challenges to the sustainable urban development. In this study, a system dynamics-based model was proposed and used to dynamically evaluate the sustainability of the urban development under five different policy scenarios in response to population shrinkage. A model was applied to socioeconomic data from eight shrinking cities in Northeast China from 2002 to 2017 to investigate the past and future trends in their urban development sustainability from 2002 to 2035. The results show that the development sustainability indices of the eight cities increased overall up to 2017. However, some then peaked and are now declining. The model predicts that the cities would vary considerably in their development sustainability across the five different scenarios. For example, with smart shrinkage policies, cities are predicted to sustain their current levels of development sustainability; meanwhile, with anti-shrinkage policies, where growth-oriented development is pursued, some cities are also predicted to see improvements in sustainability. The present study provides a technical approach to simulating and investigating the circular feedback mechanism between components of a city system and effectively correlating population shrinkage with urban development sustainability across different policy responses to urban shrinkage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据