4.3 Article

An adsorption-permeability model of coal with slippage effect under stress and temperature coupling condition

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2019.102983

关键词

Stress and temperature coupling; Permeability; Adsorption; Slippage effect; Excess adsorption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51804085, 51911530203]
  2. Science and Technology Funding Projects of Guizhou Province [J2015-2049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Temperature and slippage effect, two important factors affecting coalbed methane (CBM) production, both have an intuitive effect on gas adsorption in coal seams and coal deformation and gas seepage processes. In order to simulate the process of CBM exploitation, isothermal adsorption tests at different temperatures and seepage tests under rising pore pressure were carried out. In this study, the modified Langmuir model considering the effects of temperature and excess adsorption was established. On this basis, the amount of adsorption deformation was calculated. The results show that the amount grows with the rise of pore pressure and is negatively related to temperature. In addition, a temperature mutation coefficient (gamma(T)) was introduced to characterize the response of coal permeability to temperature, and thermal expansion, thermal cracking, adsorption deformation induced by temperature and slippage effect were combined to establish a coal permeability model under the coupling of stress and temperature. Meanwhile, a helium parallel seepage test was carried out under the same conditions to study the effects of slippage and adsorption expansion. It is found that the rise of pore pressure will reduce permeability under the action of adsorption or slippage effects, and the rise of temperature will enhance the permeability. Finally, according to the experimental data, the adsorption-permeability model achieves better fitting results, compared with other models. The model can provide certain theoretical support for CBM exploitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据