4.7 Article

Rising CO2 enhances hypoxia tolerance in a marine fish

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51572-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. NERC GW4+ Doctoral Training Partnership studentship from the Natural Environment Research Council [NE/L002434/1]
  2. CASE partner, The Centre of Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas)
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D005108/1, BB/J00913X/1]
  4. NERC [NE/H017402/1]
  5. BBSRC [BB/J00913X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. NERC [NE/H017402/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global environmental change is increasing hypoxia in aquatic ecosystems. During hypoxic events, bacterial respiration causes an increase in carbon dioxide (CO2) while oxygen (O-2) declines. This is rarely accounted for when assessing hypoxia tolerances of aquatic organisms. We investigated the impact of environmentally realistic increases in CO2 on responses to hypoxia in European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). We conducted a critical oxygen (O-2crit) test, a common measure of hypoxia tolerance, using two treatments in which O-2 levels were reduced with constant ambient CO2 levels (similar to 530 mu atm), or with reciprocal increases in CO2 (rising to similar to 2,500 mu atm). We also assessed blood acid-base chemistry and haemoglobin-O-2 binding affinity of sea bass in hypoxic conditions with ambient (similar to 650 mu atm) or raised CO2 (similar to 1770 mu atm) levels. Sea bass exhibited greater hypoxia tolerance (similar to 20% reduced O-2crit), associated with increased haemoglobin-O-2 affinity (similar to 32% fall in P-50) of red blood cells, when exposed to reciprocal changes in O-2 and CO2. This indicates that rising CO2 which accompanies environmental hypoxia facilitates increased O-2 uptake by the blood in low O-2 conditions, enhancing hypoxia tolerance. We recommend that when impacts of hypoxia on aquatic organisms are assessed, due consideration is given to associated environmental increases in CO2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据