4.8 Article

TFPa/HADHA is required for fatty acid beta-oxidation and cardiolipin re-modeling in human cardiomyocytes

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12482-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01GM097372, R01GM083867, 1P01GM081619, R01HL146436, R01HL135143]
  2. NHLBI Progenitor Cell Biology Consortium [U01HL099997, UO1HL099993]
  3. Academy of Finland
  4. Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research
  5. Wellstone Muscular Dystrophy Cooperative Research Center [U54AR065139]
  6. NSERC
  7. National Institute of Health [F32 HL126332]
  8. WRF Posdoctoral Fellowship Program
  9. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
  10. ational Science Foundation [CBET-1509106, CMMI-1661730]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondrial trifunctional protein deficiency, due to mutations in hydratase subunit A (HADHA), results in sudden infant death syndrome with no cure. To reveal the disease etiology, we generated stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes from HADHA-deficient hiPSCs and accelerated their maturation via an engineered microRNA maturation cocktail that upregulated the epigenetic regulator, HOPX. Here we report, matured HADHA mutant cardiomyocytes treated with an endogenous mixture of fatty acids manifest the disease phenotype: defective calcium dynamics and repolarization kinetics which results in a pro-arrhythmic state. Single cell RNA-seq reveals a cardiomyocyte developmental intermediate, based on metabolic gene expression. This intermediate gives rise to mature-like cardiomyocytes in control cells but, mutant cells transition to a pathological state with reduced fatty acid beta-oxidation, reduced mitochondrial proton gradient, disrupted cristae structure and defective cardiolipin remodeling. This study reveals that HADHA (tri-functional protein alpha), a monolysocardiolipin acyltransferase-like enzyme, is required for fatty acid beta-oxidation and cardiolipin remodeling, essential for functional mitochondria in human cardiomyocytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据