4.8 Article

An interhemispheric neural circuit allowing binocular integration in the optic tectum

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13484-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. ATIP/AVENIR program starting grant
  2. CNRS, INSERM
  3. Institut Curie
  4. UCL Excellence Fellowship
  5. Wellcome Trust [101195/Z/13/Z]
  6. Royal Society
  7. EMBO Shortterm Fellowship
  8. Institut Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship
  9. FRM Postdoctoral Fellowship
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds PhD Fellowship
  11. UCL IMPACT studentship
  12. European Union [666003]
  13. ERC-StG [311159-Zebratectum]
  14. Laboratoire d'Excellence (LABEX) entitled DEEP [ANR -11-LABX-0044]
  15. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-11-LABX-0044] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  16. Wellcome Trust [101195/Z/13/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Binocular stereopsis requires the convergence of visual information from corresponding points in visual space seen by two different lines of sight. This may be achieved by super-position of retinal input from each eye onto the same downstream neurons via ipsi- and contralaterally projecting optic nerve fibers. Zebrafish larvae can perceive binocular cues during prey hunting but have exclusively contralateral retinotectal projections. Here we report brain activity in the tectal neuropil ipsilateral to the visually stimulated eye, despite the absence of ipsilateral retinotectal projections. This activity colocalizes with arbors of commissural neurons, termed intertectal neurons (ITNs), that connect the tectal hemispheres. ITNs are GABAergic, establish tectal synapses bilaterally and respond to small moving stimuli. ITN-ablation impairs capture swim initiation when prey is positioned in the binocular strike zone. We propose an intertectal circuit that controls execution of the prey-capture motor program following binocular localization of prey, without requiring ipsilateral retinotectal projections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据