4.8 Article

Highly sensitive amperometric biosensor based on electrochemically-reduced graphene oxide-chitosan/hemoglobin nanocomposite for nitromethane determination

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 894-900

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.01.028

关键词

Electrochemically-reduced graphene oxide; Graphene-chitosan/hemoglobin nano-composite; Direct electrochemistry; Nitromethane; Electrochemical biosensor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21475032, 21175032, 21405035]
  2. Natural Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of Hubei Province of China [2014CFA015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitromethane (CH3NO2) is an important organic chemical raw material with a wide variety of applications as well as one of the most common pollutants. Therefore it is pretty important to establish a simple and sensitive detection method for CH3NO2. in our study, a novel amperometric biosensor for nitromethane (CH3NO2) based on immobilization of electrochemically-reduced graphene oxide (rGO), chitosan (CS) and hemoglobin (Hb) on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) was constructed. Scanning electron microscopy, infrared spectroscopy and electrochemical methods were used to characterize the Hb-CS/rGO-CS composite film. The effects of scan rate and pH of phosphate buffer on the biosensor have been studied in detail and optimized. Due to the graphene and chitosan nanocomposite, the developed biosensor demonstrating direct electrochemistry with faster electron-transfer rate (6.48 s(-1)) and excellent catalytic activity towards CH3NO2. Under optimal conditions, the proposed biosensor exhibited fast amperometric response (< 5 s) to CH3NO2 with a wide linear range of 5 mu M similar to 1.46 mM (R=0.999) and a low detection limit of 1.5 mu M (S/N=3). In addition, the biosensor had high selectivity, reproducibility and stability, providing the possibility for monitoring CH3NO2 in complex real samples. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据