4.5 Article

Improving the efficiency of wheat microspore culture methodology: evaluation of pretreatments, gradients, and epigenetic chemicals

期刊

PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE
卷 139, 期 3, 页码 589-599

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-019-01704-5

关键词

Doubled haploidy; Histone deacetylase inhibitors; Microspore culture; Microspore embryogenesis; Wheat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Key message Enhanced microspore embryogenesis and green plant regeneration in spring and winter wheat was observed with 21 or 28 days cold pretreatments, a 23% maltose gradient, and the application of trichostatin A (TSA). The objective of the study was to develop efficient widely adaptable microspore culture methodology for spring and winter wheat genotypes. Current wheat microspore culture methods are still inadequate for routine application, especially for winter genotypes. The present study involved increasing the frequency of microspore embryogenesis and improving the conversion of microspore-derived embryos to fertile green plants. A systematic evaluation was conducted testing numerous factors at all phases of the microspore embryogenesis process. Results from pretreatments, maltose gradients, and histone deacetylase inhibitors are presented. A 28 days cold pretreatment of spikes was optimal for winter wheat genotypes whereas a 21 days cold pretreatment was best for spring genotypes. Microspore suspensions containing a high frequency of embryogenic microspores were collected by resuspension in a 23% maltose gradient with subsequent pelleting with a mannitol containing solution. The application of trichostatin A (TSA) enhanced embryogenesis and/or green plant regeneration. Other epigenetic chemicals like scriptaid, BIX-01294, and sodium butyrate were also evaluated. Scriptaid enhanced embryogenesis but regenerated plantlets showed abnormal shoot and root development. The improved methodology was validated using a range of spring and winter wheat genotypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据