4.8 Article

Majorana-like Zero Modes in Kekule Distorted Sonic Lattices

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 123, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.196601

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [714577 PHONOMETA]
  2. MINECO through a Ramon y Cajal grant [RYC-2015-17156]
  3. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad of the Spanish Government
  4. European Union Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) [TEC2014-53088-C3-1-R]
  5. MINECO/FEDER [FIS2015-65706-P]
  6. Ramon y Cajal fellowship [RYC-2016-21188]
  7. [RTI2018-093921-A-C42]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Topological phases have recently been realized in bosonic systems. The associated boundary modes between regions of distinct topology have been used to demonstrate robust waveguiding, protected from defects by the topology of the surrounding bulk. A related type of topologically protected state that is not propagating but is bound to a defect has not been demonstrated to date in a bosonic setting. Here we demonstrate numerically and experimentally that an acoustic mode can be topologically bound to a vortex fabricated in a two-dimensional, Kekule-distorted triangular acoustic lattice. Such lattice realizes an acoustic analog of the Jackiw-Rossi mechanism that topologically binds a bound state in a p-wave superconductor vortex. The acoustic bound state is thus a bosonic analog of a Majorana bound state, where the two valleys replace particle and hole components. We numerically show that it is topologically protected against arbitrary symmetry-preserving local perturbations, and remains pinned to the Dirac frequency of the unperturbed lattice regardless of parameter variations. We demonstrate our prediction experimentally by 3D printing the vortex pattern in a plastic matrix and measuring the spectrum of the acoustic response of the device. Despite viscothermal losses, the measured topological resonance remains robust, with its frequency closely matching our simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据