4.7 Article

Mutation of doublesex in Hyphantria cunea results in sex-specific sterility

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 76, 期 5, 页码 1673-1682

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.5687

关键词

Hyphantria cunea; doubelsex; CRISPR; Cas9 system; sex-specific sterility; pest management

资金

  1. Special Fund for Forest Scientific Research in Public Welfare [201504302]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB11010600]
  3. National Science Foundation of China [31420103918]
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFD0600203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND The gene doublesex (dsx) plays pivotal roles in sex determination and controls sexually dimorphic development in certain insects. Importantly, it also displays a potential candidate target for pest management due to its sex-specific splicing. Therefore, we used CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene disruption to investigate the function of dsx in Hyphantria cunea, an invasive forest pest. RESULT In the present study, we identified the dsx gene from H. cunea which showed a sex-biased expression pattern that was different from other lepidopteran insects. Referring to sex-specific functional analyses in Bombyx mori, we performed a site-specific knockout of the Hcdsx gene by using a CRISPR/Cas9 system, which induced severe abnormalities in external genitalia and some incomplete sex reversal phenotypes, which in turn led to reduced sex-specific fecundity. An alternative splicing pattern of Hcdsx was altered by CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutation, and alterations in splicing affected expression of downstream genes encoding pheromone binding protein 1, vg1 and vg2 (encoding vitellogenin), which contributed to the sex-specific sterility phenotypes in the Hcdsx mutants. CONCLUSION The Hcdsx gene plays important roles in sexual differentiation in H. cunea. Disruption of Hcdsx induced sex-specific sterility, demonstrating a potential application in control of this pest. (c) 2019 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据