4.3 Article

KLF2 Protects against Osteoarthritis by Repressing Oxidative Response through Activation of Nrf2/ARE Signaling In Vitro and In Vivo

期刊

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2019/8564681

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (CN) [2015020473]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81272946]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a multifactorial and inflammatory disease characterized by cartilage destruction that can cause disability among aging patients. There is currently no effective treatment that can arrest or reverse OA progression. Kruppel-like factor 2 (KLF2), a member of the zinc finger family, has emerged as a transcription factor involved in a wide variety of inflammatory diseases. Here, we identified that KLF2 expression is downregulated in IL-1 beta-treated human chondrocytes and OA cartilage. Genetic and pharmacological overexpression of KLF2 suppressed IL-1 beta-induced apoptosis and matrix degradation through the suppression of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. In addition, KLF2 overexpression resulted in increased expression of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) and NAD(P)H dehydrogenase quinone 1 (NQO1) through the enhanced nuclear translocation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2). Further, Nrf2 inhibition abrogated the chondroprotective effects of KLF2. Safranin O/fast green and TUNEL staining demonstrated that adenovirus-mediated overexpression of KLF2 in joint cartilage protects rats against experimental OA by inhibiting cartilage degradation and chondrocyte apoptosis. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that KLF2 overexpression significantly decreases MMP13 expression caused by OA progression in vivo. This in vitro and in vivo study is the first to investigate the antioxidative effect and mechanisms of KLF2 in OA pathogenesis. Our results collectively provide new insights into OA pathogenesis regulated by KLF2 and a rationale for the development of effective OA intervention strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据