4.8 Article

PADS Arsenal: a database of prokaryotic defense systems related genes

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 48, 期 D1, 页码 D590-D598

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz916

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research Program of China [2016YFB0201702]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31771465, 31970634]
  3. Promoting Big Data Development Project, the National Development and Reform Commission of China [2016-999999-65-01-000696-07]
  4. International Partnership Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [153F11KYSB20160008]
  5. 13th Five-year Informatization Plan of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XXH13505-05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Defense systems are vital weapons for prokaryotes to resist heterologous DNA and survive from the constant invasion of viruses, and they are widely used in biochemistry investigation and antimicrobial drug research. So far, numerous types of defense systems have been discovered, but there is no comprehensive defense systems database to organize prokaryotic defense gene datasets. To fill this gap, we unveil the prokaryotic antiviral defense system (PADS) Arsenal (https://bigd.big.ac.cn/padsarsenal), a public database dedicated to gathering, storing, analyzing and visualizing prokaryotic defense gene datasets. The initial version of PADS Arsenal integrates 18 distinctive categories of defense system with the annotation of 6 600 264 genes retrieved from 63,701 genomes across 33 390 species of archaea and bacteria. PADS Arsenal provides various ways to retrieve defense systems related genes information and visualize them with multifarious function modes. Moreover, an online analysis pipeline is integrated into PADS Arsenal to facilitate annotation and evolutionary analysis of defense genes. PADS Arsenal can also visualize the dynamic variation information of defense genes from pan-genome analysis. Overall, PADS Arsenal is a state-of-the-art open comprehensive resource to accelerate the research of prokaryotic defense systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据